From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@csd.uu.se>
Cc: david@gibson.dropbear.id.au, linuxppc64-dev@ozlabs.org,
anton@samba.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.12-rc1-mm5 1/3] perfctr: ppc64 arch hooks
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 10:25:14 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050401102514.505ad059.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <16973.17085.561804.567539@alkaid.it.uu.se>
Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@csd.uu.se> wrote:
>
> In addition, there is one unresolved issue:
> - A counter's value is represented by a 64-bit software sum,
> a 32-bit start value containing the HW counter's value at the
> start of the current time slice, and the current HW counter's value
> (now). The actual value is computed as sum + (now - start).
> This is reflected in the mmap()ed state, which contains a variable-
> length { u32 map; u32 start; u64 sum; } pmc[] array.
> This layout is very cache-efficient on current 32 and 64-bit CPUs,
> but there is a _possible_ concern that it won't do on 10+ GHz CPUs.
> So the question is, should we change it to use 64-bit start values
> already now (and take more cache misses), or should that wait a few
> years until it becomes a necessity (causing ABI change issues)?
I'd be inclined to make the change now, personally. ABI changes are a pain
for everyone.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-01 18:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-31 22:07 Mikael Pettersson
2005-03-31 23:11 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-31 23:49 ` David Gibson
2005-04-01 1:33 ` Andrew Morton
2005-04-01 12:46 ` Mikael Pettersson
2005-04-01 18:25 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2005-04-04 3:25 ` David Gibson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050401102514.505ad059.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc64-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=mikpe@csd.uu.se \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®