From: Al Viro <viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk>
To: Renate Meijer <kleuske@xs4all.nl>
Cc: Dag Arne Osvik <da@osvik.no>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>,
Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>,
Kyle Moffett <mrmacman_g4@mac.com>,
Grzegorz Kulewski <kangur@polcom.net>,
Kenneth Johansson <ken@kenjo.org>
Subject: Re: Use of C99 int types
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 21:57:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050404205718.GZ8859@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c3057294a216d19047bdca201fc97e2f@xs4all.nl>
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 10:30:52PM +0200, Renate Meijer wrote:
> When used improperly. The #define Al Viro objected to, is
> objectionable. It's highly
> misleading, as Mr. Viro pointed out. I fail to see where he made
> comments on stdint.h
> as such.
Comments on stdint.h are very simple: ...fast... type names are misleading
in exactly the same way as that define. The fact that they are in standard
does not outweight the confusion potential.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-04 21:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-03 11:55 Dag Arne Osvik
2005-04-03 12:05 ` Stephen Rothwell
2005-04-03 12:30 ` Dag Arne Osvik
2005-04-03 13:27 ` Andreas Schwab
2005-04-03 22:48 ` Dag Arne Osvik
2005-04-03 23:05 ` Al Viro
2005-04-03 23:17 ` Grzegorz Kulewski
2005-04-03 23:20 ` Dag Arne Osvik
2005-04-04 0:05 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-04-03 18:13 ` Al Viro
2005-04-03 23:03 ` Dag Arne Osvik
2005-04-04 3:08 ` Herbert Xu
2005-04-04 8:42 ` Dag Arne Osvik
2005-04-03 19:23 ` Renate Meijer
2005-04-03 20:25 ` Kenneth Johansson
2005-04-03 22:08 ` Kyle Moffett
2005-04-04 10:05 ` Renate Meijer
2005-04-04 10:50 ` Dag Arne Osvik
2005-04-04 20:30 ` Renate Meijer
2005-04-04 20:57 ` Al Viro [this message]
2005-04-04 21:25 ` Richard B. Johnson
2005-04-04 21:49 ` Kyle Moffett
2005-04-05 9:23 ` Renate Meijer
2005-04-05 11:27 ` Kyle Moffett
[not found] ` <09142f748cc6ad2bf4fffab7a5519226@xs4all.nl>
2005-04-05 22:11 ` Kyle Moffett
[not found] ` <eb65bccddde63541ae4b7b2d6c4c32d3@xs4all.nl>
2005-04-06 21:11 ` Kyle Moffett
2005-04-07 11:28 ` Renate Meijer
2005-04-05 12:18 ` Richard B. Johnson
2005-04-05 21:47 ` Kyle Moffett
2005-04-05 8:49 ` Renate Meijer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050404205718.GZ8859@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk \
--to=viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=da@osvik.no \
--cc=kangur@polcom.net \
--cc=ken@kenjo.org \
--cc=kleuske@xs4all.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mrmacman_g4@mac.com \
--cc=schwab@suse.de \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®