mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Chen, Kenneth W" <kenneth.w.chen@intel.com>
To: "'Ingo Molnar'" <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: "Paul Jackson" <pj@engr.sgi.com>, <torvalds@osdl.org>,
	<nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>, <akpm@osdl.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [patch] sched: auto-tune migration costs [was: Re: Industry db benchmark result on recent 2.6 kernels]
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 20:33:14 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200504060333.j363XFg23271@unix-os.sc.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050405030447.GA13590@elte.hu>

Ingo Molnar wrote on Monday, April 04, 2005 8:05 PM
>
> latest patch attached. Changes:
>
>  - stabilized calibration even more, by using cache flushing
>    instructions to generate a predictable working set. The cache
>    flushing itself is not timed, it is used to create quiescent
>    cache  state.
>
>    I only guessed the ia64 version - e.g. i didnt know what 'type'
>    argument to pass to ia64_sal_cache_flush() to get a d/cache
>    flush+invalidate.

It is preferable to use a ia64_pal_cache_flush instead of SAL call. But
it hangs the machine with that pal call.  I will look at it tomorrow.
The type argument for sal_cache_flush is: 1 for icache, 2 for dcache,
and 3 for i+d.


>  - due to more stable results, reduced ITERATIONS from 3 to 2 - this
>    should further speed up calibration.
>
> tested on x86, the calibration results look ok there.

Calibration result on ia64 (1.5 GHz, 9 MB), somewhat smaller in this
version compare to earlier estimate of 10.4ms.  The optimal setting
found by a db workload is around 16 ms.

---------------------
| migration cost matrix (max_cache_size: 9437184, cpu: -1 MHz):

---------------------
          [00]    [01]    [02]    [03]
[00]:     -     9.3(0)  9.3(0)  9.3(0)
[01]:   9.3(0)    -     9.3(0)  9.3(0)
[02]:   9.3(0)  9.3(0)    -     9.3(0)
[03]:   9.3(0)  9.3(0)  9.3(0)    -
--------------------------------
| cacheflush times [1]: 9.3 (9329800)
| calibration delay: 16 seconds
--------------------------------



  reply	other threads:[~2005-04-06  3:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-04-02  1:00 Industry db benchmark result on recent 2.6 kernels Chen, Kenneth W
2005-04-02  2:12 ` Nick Piggin
2005-04-02 14:53 ` [patch] sched: auto-tune migration costs [was: Re: Industry db benchmark result on recent 2.6 kernels] Ingo Molnar
2005-04-02 21:22   ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-03  5:53   ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-03  7:04     ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-03  8:15       ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-03 11:34       ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-03 14:12         ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-03 15:01           ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-03 22:30             ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-05  6:53               ` [patch] sched: auto-tune migration costs Andi Kleen
2005-04-05  7:20                 ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-03 15:24           ` [patch] sched: auto-tune migration costs [was: Re: Industry db benchmark result on recent 2.6 kernels] Ingo Molnar
2005-04-03 23:08             ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-04  2:08               ` Nick Piggin
2005-04-04  3:55                 ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-04  5:45                   ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-04  5:50                     ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-04  5:56                   ` Nick Piggin
2005-04-04  6:38                     ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-04  6:48                       ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-04  7:37                         ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-04  6:50               ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-04  7:27                 ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-03 14:29         ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-03 23:15           ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-04  1:31           ` Chen, Kenneth W
2005-04-04  6:24             ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-04  6:39               ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-06  0:08               ` Chen, Kenneth W
2005-04-04  4:25         ` Andy Lutomirski
2005-04-04  4:36           ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-04  1:11       ` Chen, Kenneth W
2005-04-04 11:37         ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-04 17:27           ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-05  1:43           ` Chen, Kenneth W
2005-04-05  1:49             ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-05  3:04               ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-06  3:33                 ` Chen, Kenneth W [this message]
2005-04-06  6:45                   ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-08  2:27                     ` Chen, Kenneth W
2005-04-03  9:01     ` Paul Jackson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200504060333.j363XFg23271@unix-os.sc.intel.com \
    --to=kenneth.w.chen@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    --cc=pj@engr.sgi.com \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®