From: "Chen, Kenneth W" <kenneth.w.chen@intel.com>
To: "'Ingo Molnar'" <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: "Paul Jackson" <pj@engr.sgi.com>, <torvalds@osdl.org>,
<nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>, <akpm@osdl.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [patch] sched: auto-tune migration costs [was: Re: Industry db benchmark result on recent 2.6 kernels]
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 20:33:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200504060333.j363XFg23271@unix-os.sc.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050405030447.GA13590@elte.hu>
Ingo Molnar wrote on Monday, April 04, 2005 8:05 PM
>
> latest patch attached. Changes:
>
> - stabilized calibration even more, by using cache flushing
> instructions to generate a predictable working set. The cache
> flushing itself is not timed, it is used to create quiescent
> cache state.
>
> I only guessed the ia64 version - e.g. i didnt know what 'type'
> argument to pass to ia64_sal_cache_flush() to get a d/cache
> flush+invalidate.
It is preferable to use a ia64_pal_cache_flush instead of SAL call. But
it hangs the machine with that pal call. I will look at it tomorrow.
The type argument for sal_cache_flush is: 1 for icache, 2 for dcache,
and 3 for i+d.
> - due to more stable results, reduced ITERATIONS from 3 to 2 - this
> should further speed up calibration.
>
> tested on x86, the calibration results look ok there.
Calibration result on ia64 (1.5 GHz, 9 MB), somewhat smaller in this
version compare to earlier estimate of 10.4ms. The optimal setting
found by a db workload is around 16 ms.
---------------------
| migration cost matrix (max_cache_size: 9437184, cpu: -1 MHz):
---------------------
[00] [01] [02] [03]
[00]: - 9.3(0) 9.3(0) 9.3(0)
[01]: 9.3(0) - 9.3(0) 9.3(0)
[02]: 9.3(0) 9.3(0) - 9.3(0)
[03]: 9.3(0) 9.3(0) 9.3(0) -
--------------------------------
| cacheflush times [1]: 9.3 (9329800)
| calibration delay: 16 seconds
--------------------------------
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-06 3:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-02 1:00 Industry db benchmark result on recent 2.6 kernels Chen, Kenneth W
2005-04-02 2:12 ` Nick Piggin
2005-04-02 14:53 ` [patch] sched: auto-tune migration costs [was: Re: Industry db benchmark result on recent 2.6 kernels] Ingo Molnar
2005-04-02 21:22 ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-03 5:53 ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-03 7:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-03 8:15 ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-03 11:34 ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-03 14:12 ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-03 15:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-03 22:30 ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-05 6:53 ` [patch] sched: auto-tune migration costs Andi Kleen
2005-04-05 7:20 ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-03 15:24 ` [patch] sched: auto-tune migration costs [was: Re: Industry db benchmark result on recent 2.6 kernels] Ingo Molnar
2005-04-03 23:08 ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-04 2:08 ` Nick Piggin
2005-04-04 3:55 ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-04 5:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-04 5:50 ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-04 5:56 ` Nick Piggin
2005-04-04 6:38 ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-04 6:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-04 7:37 ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-04 6:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-04 7:27 ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-03 14:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-03 23:15 ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-04 1:31 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2005-04-04 6:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-04 6:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-06 0:08 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2005-04-04 4:25 ` Andy Lutomirski
2005-04-04 4:36 ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-04 1:11 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2005-04-04 11:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-04 17:27 ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-05 1:43 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2005-04-05 1:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-05 3:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-06 3:33 ` Chen, Kenneth W [this message]
2005-04-06 6:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-08 2:27 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2005-04-03 9:01 ` Paul Jackson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200504060333.j363XFg23271@unix-os.sc.intel.com \
--to=kenneth.w.chen@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=pj@engr.sgi.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®