From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 4/5] sched: RCU sched domains
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 08:18:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050406061838.GB5973@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <425323A1.5030603@yahoo.com.au>
* Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> 4/5
> One of the problems with the multilevel balance-on-fork/exec is that
> it needs to jump through hoops to satisfy sched-domain's locking
> semantics (that is, you may traverse your own domain when not
> preemptable, and you may traverse others' domains when holding their
> runqueue lock).
>
> balance-on-exec had to potentially migrate between more than one CPU
> before finding a final CPU to migrate to, and balance-on-fork needed
> to potentially take multiple runqueue locks.
>
> So bite the bullet and make sched-domains go completely RCU. This
> actually simplifies the code quite a bit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
i like it conceptually, so:
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
from now on, all domain-tree readonly uses have to be rcu_read_lock()-ed
(or otherwise have to be in a non-preemptible section). But there's a
bug in show_shedstats() which does a for_each_domain() from within a
preemptible section. (It was a bug with the current hotplug logic too i
think.)
At a minimum i think we need the fix+comment below.
Ingo
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
--- linux/kernel/sched.c.orig
+++ linux/kernel/sched.c
@@ -260,6 +260,10 @@ struct runqueue {
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct runqueue, runqueues);
+/*
+ * The domain tree (rq->sd) is RCU locked. I.e. it may only be accessed
+ * from within an rcu_read_lock() [or otherwise preempt-disabled] sections.
+ */
#define for_each_domain(cpu, domain) \
for (domain = cpu_rq(cpu)->sd; domain; domain = domain->parent)
@@ -338,6 +342,7 @@ static int show_schedstat(struct seq_fil
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
/* domain-specific stats */
+ rcu_read_lock();
for_each_domain(cpu, sd) {
enum idle_type itype;
char mask_str[NR_CPUS];
@@ -361,6 +366,7 @@ static int show_schedstat(struct seq_fil
sd->sbe_pushed, sd->sbe_attempts,
sd->ttwu_wake_remote, sd->ttwu_move_affine, sd->ttwu_move_balance);
}
+ rcu_read_unlock();
#endif
}
return 0;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-06 6:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-05 23:44 [patch 1/5] sched: remove degenerate domains Nick Piggin
2005-04-05 23:45 ` [patch 2/5] sched: NULL domains Nick Piggin
2005-04-05 23:46 ` [patch 3/5] sched: multilevel sbe and sbf Nick Piggin
2005-04-05 23:47 ` [patch 4/5] sched: RCU sched domains Nick Piggin
2005-04-05 23:49 ` [patch 5/5] sched: consolidate sbe sbf Nick Piggin
2005-04-06 6:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-06 8:09 ` Nick Piggin
2005-04-06 8:16 ` Nick Piggin
2005-04-07 7:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-07 7:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-06 6:18 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2005-04-06 8:01 ` [patch 4/5] sched: RCU sched domains Nick Piggin
2005-04-07 7:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-07 7:58 ` Nick Piggin
2005-04-11 22:15 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-04-12 0:03 ` Nick Piggin
2005-04-06 5:54 ` [patch 3/5] sched: multilevel sbe and sbf Ingo Molnar
2005-04-06 7:53 ` Nick Piggin
2005-04-06 5:45 ` [patch 2/5] sched: NULL domains Ingo Molnar
2005-04-06 5:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-06 7:51 ` Nick Piggin
2005-04-06 5:44 ` [patch 1/5] sched: remove degenerate domains Ingo Molnar
2005-04-06 7:10 ` Siddha, Suresh B
2005-04-06 7:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-06 8:12 ` Nick Piggin
2005-04-06 7:49 ` Nick Piggin
2005-04-07 7:00 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050406061838.GB5973@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®