mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Greg Edwards <edwardsg@sgi.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] CON_CONSDEV bit not set correctly on last console
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 15:53:17 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050406155317.54792458.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050405191003.GO21725@sgi.com>

Greg Edwards <edwardsg@sgi.com> wrote:
>
> According to include/linux/console.h, CON_CONSDEV flag should be set on
> the last console specified on the boot command line:
> 
>      86 #define CON_PRINTBUFFER (1)
>      87 #define CON_CONSDEV     (2) /* Last on the command line */
>      88 #define CON_ENABLED     (4)
>      89 #define CON_BOOT        (8)
> 
> This does not currently happen if there is more than one console specified
> on the boot commandline.  Instead, it gets set on the first console on the
> command line.  This can cause problems for things like kdb that look for
> the CON_CONSDEV flag to see if the console is valid.
> 
> Additionaly, it doesn't look like CON_CONSDEV is reassigned to the next
> preferred console at unregister time if the console being unregistered
> currently has that bit set.
> 
> Example (from sn2 ia64):
> 
> elilo vmlinuz root=<dev> console=ttyS0 console=ttySG0
> 
> in this case, the flags on ttySG console struct will be 0x4 (should be
> 0x6).
> 
> Attached patch against bk fixes both issues for the cases I looked at.  It
> uses selected_console (which gets incremented for each console specified
> on the command line) as the indicator of which console to set CON_CONSDEV
> on.  When adding the console to the list, if the previous one had
> CON_CONSDEV set, it masks it out.  Tested on ia64 and x86.

The `console=a console=b' behaviour seem basically random to me :(.  And it
gets re-randomised on a regular basis.

I wonder if we should leave the existing behaviour alone (continue to set
CON_CONSDEV on the first console) and just change the documentation? 
That'll minimise the disruption which we cause.

  reply	other threads:[~2005-04-06 22:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-04-05 19:10 Greg Edwards
2005-04-06 22:53 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2005-04-06 23:48   ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2005-04-07  2:11   ` Greg Edwards

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050406155317.54792458.akpm@osdl.org \
    --to=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=edwardsg@sgi.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®