From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Cc: axboe@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kenneth.w.chen@intel.com
Subject: Re: [patch 2/9] mempool gfp flag
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 12:50:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050412125025.6890b2d7.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <425BC3B0.7020707@yahoo.com.au>
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
>
> The first is that mempool_alloc can possibly get stuck in __alloc_pages
> when they should opt to fail, and take an element from their reserved pool.
>
> The second is that it will happily eat emergency PF_MEMALLOC reserves
> instead of going to their reserved pools.
>
> Fix the first by passing __GFP_NORETRY in the allocation calls in
> mempool_alloc. Fix the second by introducing a __GFP_MEMPOOL flag
> which directs the page allocator not to allocate from the reserve
> pool.
>
>
> Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/gfp.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/gfp.h 2005-04-12 22:26:10.000000000 +1000
> +++ linux-2.6/include/linux/gfp.h 2005-04-12 22:26:11.000000000 +1000
> @@ -38,14 +38,16 @@ struct vm_area_struct;
> #define __GFP_NO_GROW 0x2000u /* Slab internal usage */
> #define __GFP_COMP 0x4000u /* Add compound page metadata */
> #define __GFP_ZERO 0x8000u /* Return zeroed page on success */
> +#define __GFP_MEMPOOL 0x10000u/* Mempool allocation */
I think I'll rename this to "__GFP_NOMEMALLOC". Things other then mempool
might want to use this.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-12 21:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-12 12:43 [patch 0/9] various (mainly mempool fixes and block layer improvements) Nick Piggin
2005-04-12 12:48 ` [patch 1/9] GFP_ZERO fix Nick Piggin
2005-04-12 19:47 ` Andrew Morton
2005-04-13 1:02 ` Nick Piggin
2005-04-14 10:59 ` Manfred Spraul
2005-04-12 12:48 ` [patch 2/9] mempool gfp flag Nick Piggin
2005-04-12 19:50 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2005-04-13 1:03 ` Nick Piggin
2005-04-12 12:49 ` [patch 3/9] no PF_MEMALLOC tinkering Nick Piggin
2005-04-12 19:57 ` Andrew Morton
2005-04-13 1:13 ` Nick Piggin
2005-04-12 12:49 ` [patch 4/9] blk: no memory barrier Nick Piggin
2005-04-12 12:50 ` [patch 5/9] blk: branch hints Nick Piggin
2005-04-12 12:50 ` [patch 6/9] blk: unplug later Nick Piggin
2005-04-12 19:58 ` Andrew Morton
2005-04-13 1:32 ` Nick Piggin
2005-04-13 10:20 ` Jens Axboe
2005-04-12 12:51 ` [patch 7/9] blk: efficiency improvements Nick Piggin
2005-04-12 12:52 ` [patch 0/9] blk: reduce locking Nick Piggin
2005-04-12 12:53 ` [patch doh/9] mempool simplify alloc Nick Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050412125025.6890b2d7.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=kenneth.w.chen@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®