From: Horst von Brand <vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl>
To: Andreas Hartmann <andihartmann@01019freenet.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: More performance for the TCP stack by using additional hardware chip on NIC
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2005 19:37:18 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200504172337.j3HNbJsA004220@laptop11.inf.utfsm.cl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Message from Andreas Hartmann <andihartmann@01019freenet.de> of "Sun, 17 Apr 2005 10:17:49 +0200." <d3t63d$3qe$1@pD9F86D3F.dip0.t-ipconnect.de>
Andreas Hartmann <andihartmann@01019freenet.de> said:
> Alacritech developed a new chip for NIC's
> (http://www.alacritech.com/html/tech_review.html), which makes it possible
> to take away the TCP stack from the host CPU. Therefore, the host CPU has
> more performance for the applications according Alacritech.
>
> This sounds interesting.
This idea has been discussed around here a couple of times, and the
consensus is that it is a bad idea: IP (and upper protocol) processing
is not expensive, if done right, so this really doesn't buy much; this
forces a particular interface to networking into the kernel, loosing
flexibility that way is always bad; there is no access to futzing
around in between (for example, for firewalling and such); and if the
"hardware implementation" has bugs, you are screwed.
--
Dr. Horst H. von Brand User #22616 counter.li.org
Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 654431
Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 654239
Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile Fax: +56 32 797513
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-18 1:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-17 8:17 Andreas Hartmann
2005-04-17 9:07 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-04-17 10:29 ` Avi Kivity
2005-04-17 10:57 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-04-17 12:32 ` Avi Kivity
2005-04-17 11:30 ` Willy Tarreau
2005-04-17 12:15 ` Avi Kivity
2005-04-17 19:43 ` Bernd Eckenfels
2005-04-17 20:36 ` David S. Miller
2005-04-18 5:35 ` Avi Kivity
2005-04-17 23:37 ` Horst von Brand [this message]
2005-04-18 4:08 ` Kyle Moffett
2005-04-18 4:28 ` Willy Tarreau
[not found] <3Udkm-7rV-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <3Ue6L-867-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <3Ufm9-IB-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <3Ugid-1w6-25@gated-at.bofh.it>
2005-04-17 19:04 ` Andreas Hartmann
2005-04-18 8:27 ` Denis Vlasenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200504172337.j3HNbJsA004220@laptop11.inf.utfsm.cl \
--to=vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl \
--cc=andihartmann@01019freenet.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®