From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261302AbVDULue (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Apr 2005 07:50:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261316AbVDULue (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Apr 2005 07:50:34 -0400 Received: from ns2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:43679 "EHLO mx2.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261302AbVDULua (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Apr 2005 07:50:30 -0400 Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 13:50:30 +0200 From: Andi Kleen To: "Zou, Nanhai" Cc: Andi Kleen , discuss@x86-64.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Siddha, Suresh B" Subject: Re: [discuss] [Patch] X86_64 TASK_SIZE cleanup Message-ID: <20050421115030.GS7715@wotan.suse.de> References: <894E37DECA393E4D9374E0ACBBE74270013E8B90@pdsmsx402.ccr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <894E37DECA393E4D9374E0ACBBE74270013E8B90@pdsmsx402.ccr.corp.intel.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 01:17:40AM +0800, Zou, Nanhai wrote: > Hi Andi, > What is your comment on this patch? There is at least one wrong change in there, you have a check for test_thread_flag(TIF_IA32) && (flags & MAP_32BIT) and that is wrong because MAP_32BIT is used from 64bit code -Andi