Re: [PATCH 2.6.11] Documentation: correct minor mistake and remove redundant info from SubmittingPatches

["Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@osdl.org>]

On Thu, 21 Apr 2005 14:51:09 -0400 Cosmin Nicolaescu wrote:

| The first fix is to reverse the order of the files being diffed. Since
| we make the change in $MYFILE (and not $MYFILE.orig}, the diff should
| have the .orig file first followed by $MYFILE (which has been
| modified).

But the patch below has the .orig file second, not first.
Looks like it's backwards.... (reversed)

| The second modification is to remove redundant text. The information
| about the Trivial Patch Monkey is both in steps 4 and 5. Since trivial
| should be CCed, the information should only go in step 5 (Select your
| CC list) and be removed from step 4 (Select e-mail destination).

The second patch chunk adds text, not removes it.

| --- linux-2.6.11/Documentation/SubmittingPatches        2005-04-21 14:22:22.242714051 -0400
| +++ linux-2.6.11/Documentation/SubmittingPatches.orig   2005-04-21 14:17:07.375698154 -0400
| @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ To create a patch for a single file, it 
|         cp $MYFILE $MYFILE.orig
|         vi $MYFILE      # make your change
|         cd ..
| -       diff -up $SRCTREE/$MYFILE{,.orig} > /tmp/patch
| +       diff -up $SRCTREE/$MYFILE{.orig,} > /tmp/patch
|  
|  To create a patch for multiple files, you should unpack a "vanilla",
|  or unmodified kernel source tree, and generate a diff against your
| @@ -132,6 +132,21 @@ which require discussion or do not have 
|  usually be sent first to linux-kernel.  Only after the patch is
|  discussed should the patch then be submitted to Linus.
|  
| +For small patches you may want to CC the Trivial Patch Monkey
| +trivial@rustcorp.com.au set up by Rusty Russell; which collects "trivial"
| +patches. Trivial patches must qualify for one of the following rules:
| + Spelling fixes in documentation
| + Spelling fixes which could break grep(1).
| + Warning fixes (cluttering with useless warnings is bad)
| + Compilation fixes (only if they are actually correct)
| + Runtime fixes (only if they actually fix things)
| + Removing use of deprecated functions/macros (eg. check_region).
| + Contact detail and documentation fixes
| + Non-portable code replaced by portable code (even in arch-specific,
| + since people copy, as long as it's trivial)
| + Any fix by the author/maintainer of the file. (ie. patch monkey
| + in re-transmission mode)
| +

---
~Randy