From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262420AbVDXUyL (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 Apr 2005 16:54:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262418AbVDXUyL (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 Apr 2005 16:54:11 -0400 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:36028 "EHLO parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262417AbVDXUyJ (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 Apr 2005 16:54:09 -0400 Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 21:54:22 +0100 From: Al Viro To: Miklos Szeredi Cc: hch@infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] private mounts Message-ID: <20050424205422.GK13052@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> References: <20050424201820.GA28428@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 10:50:04PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > Also mentioned in that thread quite a few times is the fact the the > clone() and unshare() modell does not solve people's requirements. Could we please get of references to requirements without a rationale? There's quite enough of that from Carrion-Grade Linux crowd, TYVM.