From: Al Viro <viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Jan Dittmer <jdittmer@ppp0.net>,
Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux/m68k <linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.12-rc3
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 04:24:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050426032430.GR13052@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0504252113160.26096@numbat.sonytel.be>
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 09:14:01PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Apr 2005, Al Viro wrote:
> > As far as I can see that's the minimally intrusive header changes needed
> > to avoid problems - better than variant with splitting sched.h as in m68k CVS.
>
> We can discuss about that. IIRC, HCH is also in favor of splitting off struct
> task_struct from sched.h.
Sure, but splitting sched.h is a separate story. Mixing it with m68k
merge will only make both harder. It requires more include reordering
and I'd rather keep that headache separate from m68k issues. I agree
that eventual splitup of sched.h makes sense. However, I think that
going for minimally intrusive variant of merge and then dealing with
sched.h would be easier for everyone.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-26 3:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 90+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-21 0:59 Linus Torvalds
2005-04-21 1:09 ` Alejandro Bonilla
2005-04-21 1:26 ` James Purser
2005-04-21 1:38 ` Patrick McFarland
2005-04-21 2:01 ` Alejandro Bonilla
2005-04-21 4:03 ` Barry K. Nathan
2005-04-21 8:17 ` Martin Schlemmer
2005-04-21 8:49 ` Jan Dittmer
2005-04-21 8:59 ` Jan Dittmer
2005-04-21 9:10 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2005-04-21 16:11 ` Al Viro
2005-04-21 17:39 ` Al Viro
2005-04-22 22:18 ` Roman Zippel
2005-05-30 23:48 ` more thread_info patches Roman Zippel
2005-05-30 23:50 ` Roman Zippel
2005-05-30 23:51 ` Roman Zippel
2005-05-31 12:16 ` Vincent Hanquez
2005-05-30 23:52 ` Roman Zippel
2005-05-31 1:25 ` randy_dunlap
2005-05-31 9:35 ` Roman Zippel
2005-05-31 15:37 ` randy_dunlap
2005-04-21 17:45 ` Linux 2.6.12-rc3 Al Viro
2005-04-21 17:57 ` Al Viro
2005-04-21 18:08 ` Al Viro
2005-04-25 19:14 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2005-04-26 3:24 ` Al Viro [this message]
2005-04-26 8:21 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2005-04-21 18:04 ` Al Viro
2005-04-25 19:12 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2005-04-21 11:20 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-21 12:03 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-21 16:22 ` Petr Baudis
2005-04-21 19:00 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-21 19:09 ` Petr Baudis
2005-04-21 21:38 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-21 21:41 ` Petr Baudis
2005-04-23 21:31 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-21 23:22 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-21 23:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-22 0:21 ` Petr Baudis
2005-04-22 23:18 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-23 0:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-23 11:19 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-23 14:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-23 16:27 ` Pierre Ossman
2005-04-23 22:02 ` Greg KH
2005-04-23 22:29 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-23 23:38 ` Greg KH
2005-04-24 10:26 ` Andrew Morton
2005-04-24 17:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-24 19:06 ` Sam Ravnborg
2005-04-24 19:55 ` Greg KH
2005-04-24 20:17 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-24 20:29 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-24 22:48 ` David S. Miller
2005-04-24 23:17 ` Marcel Holtmann
2005-04-25 7:40 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2005-04-26 5:25 ` Len Brown
2005-04-26 5:50 ` Andrew Morton
2005-04-23 23:00 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-23 23:06 ` Petr Baudis
2005-04-24 7:21 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-24 7:35 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-04-24 5:45 ` Greg KH
2005-04-23 12:21 ` Ed Tomlinson
2005-04-23 23:23 ` Petr Baudis
2005-04-24 7:25 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-21 12:18 ` Martin Schlemmer
2005-04-22 7:55 ` H. Peter Anvin
2005-04-21 12:19 ` Ralf Hildebrandt
2005-04-21 15:45 ` Randy.Dunlap
2005-04-21 13:33 ` Andreas Steinmetz
2005-04-22 0:31 ` Greg KH
2005-04-21 14:24 ` Linux 2.6.12-rc3: Oops on IDE flash disk eject Andreas Steinmetz
2005-04-21 15:27 ` Andreas Steinmetz
2005-04-21 17:00 ` Linux 2.6.12-rc3: various swsusp problems Andreas Steinmetz
2005-04-21 18:57 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-21 20:02 ` Andreas Steinmetz
2005-04-25 9:50 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-21 20:55 ` Andreas Steinmetz
2005-04-22 15:13 ` Stefan Seyfried
2005-04-23 2:57 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-04-23 8:18 ` Stefan Seyfried
2005-04-23 9:14 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-21 19:10 ` Linux 2.6.12-rc3 Benoit Boissinot
2005-04-22 7:56 Borislav Petkov
2005-04-24 5:42 ` Greg KH
2005-04-24 6:27 ` Borislav Petkov
2005-04-24 7:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
[not found] <3VIcq-8ls-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <3VIFr-px-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <3VMJj-3Hv-61@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <3VThx-16N-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <3VUnf-1Ua-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <3WfL8-33i-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <3WgH8-3LO-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <3WqZS-3qK-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <3WtEl-5Ao-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <3WBVe-3Qn-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <3WIaj-8vN-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
2005-04-24 15:10 ` Bodo Eggert <harvested.in.lkml@posting.7eggert.dyndns.org>
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050426032430.GR13052@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk \
--to=viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jdittmer@ppp0.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®