From: "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@osdl.org>
To: vgoyal@in.ibm.com
Cc: akpm@osdl.org, ebiederm@xmission.com, fastboot@lists.osdl.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sharyathi@in.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [Fastboot] Re: Kdump Testing
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 09:11:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050428091119.73568208.rddunlap@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050428114416.GA5706@in.ibm.com>
On Thu, 28 Apr 2005 17:14:16 +0530
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@in.ibm.com> wrote:
> > > Can you post a full serial console output of second kernel? That would help.
> >
> > I did another test run, same kernels (both running and recovery).
> > The recovery kernel got a little further this time, still had
> > Badness and a BUG.
> >
> > ---
>
> Ok. I am also able to see this slab corruption occurring on my machine. I can
> get away with the problem if I disable cachefs support.
>
> Infact, I can reproduce the problem if I boot capture kernel normally through
> BIOS with commandline "mem=64M". Looks like it is generic problem and not
> associated with kexec/kdump. Cachefs might be doing some corruption.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Wheeeeeeeeee. Great, we (I) can do without cachefs,
and when I do that, kexec + kdump works.
First time that I've seen kdump work. :)
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1.0G Apr 28 08:41 oldmem.0428
-r-------- 1 root root 960M Apr 28 08:36 vmcore.0428
My (crashing/panic) kernel is built without -g, but gdb
can still tell me this much:
(gdb) bt
#0 0xc010ef95 in crash_get_current_regs ()
#1 0x00000000 in ?? ()
#2 0xee821ea0 in ?? ()
#3 0xee821ea0 in ?? ()
#4 0xee821ea0 in ?? ()
#5 0x00000046 in ?? ()
#6 0x00000000 in ?? ()
#7 0x00000000 in ?? ()
#8 0x00000000 in ?? ()
#9 0xee82c000 in ?? ()
#10 0x00000000 in ?? ()
#11 0xc010ed38 in machine_kexec ()
Thanks for following up, tracking, working on this.
---
~Randy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-28 16:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-23 3:30 Vivek Goyal
2005-04-25 12:15 ` Nagesh Sharyathi
2005-04-25 23:09 ` Randy.Dunlap
2005-04-26 8:54 ` Vivek Goyal
2005-04-27 16:46 ` Randy.Dunlap
2005-04-27 19:23 ` Randy.Dunlap
2005-04-28 11:44 ` Vivek Goyal
2005-04-28 16:11 ` Randy.Dunlap [this message]
2005-04-28 19:08 ` Eric W. Biederman
2005-04-29 3:08 ` [PATCH] Kdump docs Randy.Dunlap
2005-04-29 5:07 ` Vivek Goyal
2005-04-29 14:26 ` [Fastboot] " Randy.Dunlap
2005-04-30 3:04 ` [PATCH] Kdump doc. fix option typo Randy.Dunlap
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-04-22 10:46 Kdump Testing Nagesh Sharyathi
2005-04-22 12:32 ` [Fastboot] " Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050428091119.73568208.rddunlap@osdl.org \
--to=rddunlap@osdl.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=fastboot@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sharyathi@in.ibm.com \
--cc=vgoyal@in.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®