From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262734AbVD2OhT (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Apr 2005 10:37:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262753AbVD2OhJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Apr 2005 10:37:09 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.210]:30189 "EHLO mail.lst.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262734AbVD2Ofu (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Apr 2005 10:35:50 -0400 Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 16:35:45 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [hch: Re: [PATCH] cifs: handle termination of cifs oplockd kernel thread] Message-ID: <20050429143545.GB7592@lst.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-Spam-Score: -4.901 () BAYES_00 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org sorry, forgot to Cc lkml ----- Forwarded message from Christoph Hellwig ----- Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 16:34:51 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] cifs: handle termination of cifs oplockd kernel thread To: sfrench@us.ibm.com care to explain what http://www.kernel.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=f28ac91b0541a49d5bc7bfb9f0efd5289a7dd181 does and who revied that? Things like that don't have a business in the kernel, and certainly not as ioctl. ----- End forwarded message -----