From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261517AbVEBQ7r (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 May 2005 12:59:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261451AbVEBQmJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 May 2005 12:42:09 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:52135 "EHLO mx2.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261461AbVEBQlP (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 May 2005 12:41:15 -0400 Date: Mon, 2 May 2005 18:41:14 +0200 From: Andi Kleen To: blaisorblade@yahoo.it Cc: akpm@osdl.org, jdike@addtoit.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, ak@suse.de Subject: Re: [patch 1/1] x86_64: make string func definition work as intended Message-ID: <20050502164114.GG7342@wotan.suse.de> References: <20050501190851.5FD5B45EBB@zion> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050501190851.5FD5B45EBB@zion> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > I agree this can be a bit kludgy, so if you want add another solution. Patch is ok for me, but you have a good chance of having broken other archs too due to the string.c changes. Probably needs some testing. -Andi