From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261279AbVECB3f (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 May 2005 21:29:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261282AbVECB3f (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 May 2005 21:29:35 -0400 Received: from fire.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:40619 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261279AbVECB3b (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 May 2005 21:29:31 -0400 Date: Mon, 2 May 2005 18:28:51 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Al Viro Cc: jdike@addtoit.com, torvalds@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/22] UML - Include the linker script rather than symlink it Message-Id: <20050502182851.27f22470.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20050503011744.GC18977@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> References: <200505012112.j41LC9fa016385@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> <20050502170654.248b11ea.akpm@osdl.org> <20050503002521.GA18977@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> <20050502174405.0c8cad31.akpm@osdl.org> <20050503011744.GC18977@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.0 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-vine-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Al Viro wrote: > > On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 05:44:05PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > There's a bit of a tangle going on in arch/um/kernel/Makefile, but it's > > fairly simple stuff. > > > > I put a rolled-up patch against 2.6.12-rc3 at > > http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/x.bz2 if someone wants to > > check it all. > > Broken, due to missing mk_sc patch (it should go before mk_thread one; OK. I ended up with an odd-looking arch/um/sys-x86_64/util/Makefile: # Copyright 2003 - 2004 Pathscale, Inc # Released under the GPL hostprogs-y := mk_sc mk_thread always := $(hostprogs-y) HOSTCFLAGS_mk_thread.o := -I$(objtree)/arch/um Is mk_sc still supposed to be in there? > how the hell did the latter manage to apply at all?) I just "fixed" things. I do it all the time. > > Is this all considered post-2.6.12 material? > > Once all patches are in there - up to Jeff ;-) Seriously, kbuild patchkit > is decently tested and has obviously no impact on other architectures. So > that one is up to maintainer of architecture in question... OK..