From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261423AbVEJABi (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 May 2005 20:01:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261436AbVEJABi (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 May 2005 20:01:38 -0400 Received: from fire.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:47758 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261423AbVEJABh (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 May 2005 20:01:37 -0400 Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 17:02:08 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Blaisorblade Cc: jdike@addtoit.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, bstroesser@fujitsu-siemens.com Subject: Re: [patch 0/6] latest bugfixes for 2.6.12 Message-Id: <20050509170208.6c70a3ba.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <200505100139.02512.blaisorblade@yahoo.it> References: <200505100110.16920.blaisorblade@yahoo.it> <20050509164546.0d6d136b.akpm@osdl.org> <200505100139.02512.blaisorblade@yahoo.it> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.0 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-vine-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Blaisorblade wrote: > > > Jeff sent in fixes which were dependent on other things I had, we're maybe > > several weeks away from 2.6.12, > Several weeks away? Hope so. We lost a lot of testing due to lack of daily snapshots and general SCM churn. Plus I have a boatload of bug reports to follow up on here.