mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@in.ibm.com>
To: Alexander Nyberg <alexn@telia.com>
Cc: ebiederm@xmission.com, vgoyal@in.ibm.com,
	linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	fastboot@lists.osdl.org, rddunlap@osdl.org,
	Ralf.Hildebrandt@charite.de, petkov@uni-muenster.de,
	Morton Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	coywolf@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Fastboot] Fw: Re: kexec?
Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 14:27:52 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050511085752.GB28791@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1115800228.917.25.camel@localhost.localdomain>

On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 10:30:28AM +0200, Alexander Nyberg wrote:
> > > kexec-tools-1.101 does not contain your last patch series (that includes
> > > --crashdump which is lacking from the above cmdline). Currently you need
> > > to patch up 1.101 with the stuff from 
> > > [RFC/PATCH 5/17][kexec-tools-1.101] Add command line option
> > > "--crash-dump" etc.
> > > 
> > > It would be good having a 1.2 or something with the patches included on
> > > the site...
> > 
> > We have uploaded the kdump related user space patches which can be 
> > accessed at following link.
> > 
> > http://lse.sourceforge.net/kdump/patches/
> > 
> > A single consolidated patch can be applied on top of kexec-tools-1.101.tar.gz
> > to get kdump working.
> 
> I had no idea this address existed, only when looking at my lkml-archive
> i saw it posted this monday (!), prior to that I had not seen it and I
> watch things quite closely.

Yes, you are right. Earlier the kexec-tools patches implementing kdump
were just posted on mailing lists but now they are on the mentioned site.

> How is anyone gonna try it out if it isn't announced and the proper
> procedure of getting it going known? Randys recent kdump.txt update made
> things alot clearer but it won't help finding the right source and
> patches. Although personally I'd put up a complete tarball instead of a
> patch so users/testers don't have to manually patch it up.
> 
> Also the latest kexec patches are at http://www.xmission.com/~ebiederm/files/kexec/
> nowdays and not with Randy. And there is even more confusion to it as there is:
> kexec-tools-1.101.tar.gz
> kexec-tools-1.99.tar.gz
> 
> I don't know about you but if I didn't know i'd definately go with the 1.99 one
> even if 1.101 is the latest version.
> 

You are right again and your patch for kdump.txt should clarify the confusions. Thanks for the patch.

Andrew,

Please include the following kdump.txt patch.

Thanks
Vivek

> Index: mm/Documentation/kdump.txt
> ===================================================================
> --- mm.orig/Documentation/kdump.txt	2005-05-06 08:55:43.000000000 +0200
> +++ mm/Documentation/kdump.txt	2005-05-11 10:16:38.000000000 +0200
> @@ -35,7 +35,9 @@
>  SETUP
>  =====
>  
> -1) Download and build the appropriate version of kexec-tools.
> +1) Download http://www.xmission.com/~ebiederm/files/kexec/kexec-tools-1.101.tar.gz
> +   and apply http://lse.sourceforge.net/kdump/patches/kexec-tools-1.101-kdump.patch
> +   and after that build the source.
>  
>  2) Download and build the appropriate (latest) kexec/kdump (-mm) kernel
>     patchset and apply it to the vanilla kernel tree.
> Index: mm/MAINTAINERS
> ===================================================================
> --- mm.orig/MAINTAINERS	2005-05-06 08:55:57.000000000 +0200
> +++ mm/MAINTAINERS	2005-05-11 10:24:35.000000000 +0200
> @@ -1339,7 +1339,6 @@
>  M:	ebiederm@xmission.com
>  M:	rddunlap@osdl.org
>  W:	http://www.xmission.com/~ebiederm/files/kexec/
> -W:	http://developer.osdl.org/rddunlap/kexec/
>  L:	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>  L:	fastboot@osdl.org
>  S:	Maintained
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2005-05-11  9:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20050510193225.53192aad.akpm@osdl.org>
2005-05-11  3:02 ` Vivek Goyal
2005-05-11  7:10   ` Alexander Nyberg
2005-05-11  8:09     ` Vivek Goyal
2005-05-11  8:30       ` Alexander Nyberg
2005-05-11  8:57         ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2005-05-12  3:35         ` randy_dunlap

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050511085752.GB28791@in.ibm.com \
    --to=vgoyal@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=Ralf.Hildebrandt@charite.de \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=alexn@telia.com \
    --cc=coywolf@gmail.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=fastboot@lists.osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=petkov@uni-muenster.de \
    --cc=rddunlap@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®