mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] kernel/sched.c: remove two unused functions
Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 22:35:05 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050513223505.7c2b5478.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050513004716.GR3603@stusta.de>

Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> wrote:
>
> This patch removes the unused functions wait_for_completion_timeout and 
> wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout.
> 
> Is any usage for them planned or is this patch OK?
> 

>From the changelog for the patch which added these functions:



Adds 3 new completion API calls, which are a straightforward extension of
the current APIs:
  
 int wait_for_completion_interruptible(struct completion *x);
 unsigned long wait_for_completion_timeout(struct completion *x,
                                                   unsigned long timeout);
 unsigned long wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout(
                        struct completion *x, unsigned long timeout);
  
This enables the conversion of more semaphore-using code to completions.
There is code that cannot be converted right now (and is forced to use
semaphores) because these primitives are missing.  Thomas Gleixner has a
bunch of patches to make use of them.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-05-14  5:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-05-13  0:47 Adrian Bunk
2005-05-13  6:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-05-14  5:35 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-05-06 22:20 Adrian Bunk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050513223505.7c2b5478.akpm@osdl.org \
    --to=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=bunk@stusta.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®