From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261920AbVEWRku (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 May 2005 13:40:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261935AbVEWRjs (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 May 2005 13:39:48 -0400 Received: from fmr22.intel.com ([143.183.121.14]:5793 "EHLO scsfmr002.sc.intel.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261931AbVEWRdO (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 May 2005 13:33:14 -0400 Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 10:32:12 -0700 From: Ashok Raj To: Andi Kleen Cc: Ashok Raj , zwane@arm.linux.org.uk, discuss@x86-64.org, shaohua.li@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rusty@rustycorp.com.au, vatsa@in.ibm.com Subject: Re: [patch 2/4] CPU hot-plug support for x86_64 Message-ID: <20050523103211.A8692@unix-os.sc.intel.com> References: <20050520221622.124069000@csdlinux-2.jf.intel.com> <20050520223417.532048000@csdlinux-2.jf.intel.com> <20050523163816.GA39821@muc.de> <20050523095816.B8193@unix-os.sc.intel.com> <20050523172424.GG39821@muc.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20050523172424.GG39821@muc.de>; from ak@muc.de on Mon, May 23, 2005 at 07:24:24PM +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 07:24:24PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 09:58:17AM -0700, Ashok Raj wrote: > > > > If its for documentation, then its ok, the reason i thought it will > > be dead code/documentation soon is since 90% of the hotplug code is > > generic kernel code, which is not under __cpuinit, just some pieces of > > x86_64 would alone exist this way, and will not serve real purpose very soon. > > I would hope these other pieces get converted over. I will probably > look into that soon if nobody beats me. > If my IRC, this is how we got started early days. I remember rusty changed them during the end of the real development. Rusty/Vatsa would know the exact scope on why we went away from __cpuinit. [Both who's names i missed accidently in ccing, when i was trying the new quilt mail, i exited by mistake, and it sent to the partial list, sorry guys] -- Cheers, Ashok Raj - Open Source Technology Center