From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261916AbVE0HF7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 May 2005 03:05:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261922AbVE0HF7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 May 2005 03:05:59 -0400 Received: from fire.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:8324 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261916AbVE0G7U (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 May 2005 02:59:20 -0400 Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 23:58:23 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: "Mikael Starvik" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Introducing a new sub-architecture Message-Id: <20050526235823.7aeaf8e7.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org "Mikael Starvik" wrote: > > I'm about to submit a new sub-architecture under arch/cris and I would > like to get your input on how this is best done. I can see at least > 3 alternatives: > > 1. All the patches goes to LKML. Lots of boring patches that most > people doesn't care about. > 2. Send drivers to the driver subsystems maintainers for review > and then a big .tgz to Andrew. > 3. Send the .tgz directly to Andrew without reviews from the > driver guys. > > I leaning towards option 2, comments? 2 sounds good.