From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261186AbVFAKqy (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Jun 2005 06:46:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261187AbVFAKqy (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Jun 2005 06:46:54 -0400 Received: from lug-owl.de ([195.71.106.12]:64642 "EHLO lug-owl.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261186AbVFAKqh (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Jun 2005 06:46:37 -0400 Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 12:46:36 +0200 From: Jan-Benedict Glaw To: LKML Subject: Re: [OT] mailing list management Message-ID: <20050601104636.GS2417@lug-owl.de> Mail-Followup-To: LKML References: <429D8A3A.8000304@poczta.fm> <20050601102211.GR2417@lug-owl.de> <429D8E96.4010908@poczta.fm> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="988dVgVOOB5COf1N" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <429D8E96.4010908@poczta.fm> X-Operating-System: Linux mail 2.6.11.10lug-owl X-gpg-fingerprint: 250D 3BCF 7127 0D8C A444 A961 1DBD 5E75 8399 E1BB X-gpg-key: wwwkeys.de.pgp.net X-Echelon-Enable: howto poison arsenous mail psychological biological nuclear warfare test the bombastical terror of flooding the spy listeners explosion sex drugs and rock'n'roll X-TKUeV: howto poison arsenous mail psychological biological nuclear warfare test the bombastical terror of flooding the spy listeners explosion sex drugs and rock'n'roll User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --988dVgVOOB5COf1N Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2005-06-01 12:31:50 +0200, Lukasz Stelmach wrote: > Jan-Benedict Glaw napisa=C5=82(a): >=20 > >> I suggest > >>(re)placing any Reply-To headers in incoming letters with Reply-To: > >>linux-kernel@... before delivering them to subscribers. > > >=20 > > This is considered harmful. >=20 > Could you explain your point of view. I am subscribed to a list wher > such a thing gets done and I haven't noticed any injures ;-) http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html > > Please just configure your email client > > correctly. > ^^^^^^^^^^^^ > That is? >=20 > Well I might use "Reply to all" but then for example you would receive > two copies of this email. One in your private inbox and the other in the > list's box. Is this correct? Reply-to-List is an option. For the LKML, it's even better to do a group reply. This may allow the other party to answer in a fast manner, not waiting for a delayed LKML email... > I would even suggest placing real name in the reply to field next to > list's address. That's considered standard. MfG, JBG --=20 Jan-Benedict Glaw jbglaw@lug-owl.de . +49-172-7608481 = _ O _ "Eine Freie Meinung in einem Freien Kopf | Gegen Zensur | Gegen Krieg = _ _ O fuer einen Freien Staat voll Freier B=C3=BCrger" | im Internet! | im Ira= k! O O O ret =3D do_actions((curr | FREE_SPEECH) & ~(NEW_COPYRIGHT_LAW | DRM | TCPA)= ); --988dVgVOOB5COf1N Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCnZIMHb1edYOZ4bsRAq2WAJ9cjOwHUn+XD74eKK4RqLvGTnEcfQCdGUJL arXLSXmBVMb4TkTTUqBVDvQ= =MgVp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --988dVgVOOB5COf1N--