From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261273AbVFANET (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Jun 2005 09:04:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261284AbVFANES (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Jun 2005 09:04:18 -0400 Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.31.123]:38556 "EHLO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261273AbVFANDT (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Jun 2005 09:03:19 -0400 Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 15:02:06 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Nigel Cunningham Cc: Pavel Machek , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: Freezer Patches. Message-ID: <20050601130205.GA1940@openzaurus.ucw.cz> References: <1117629212.10328.26.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1117629212.10328.26.camel@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! > Here are the freezer patches. They were prepared against rc3, but I > think they still apply fine against rc5. (Ben, these are the same ones I > sent you the other day). 304 seems ugly and completely useless for mainline 300: stopping softirqd seems dangerous to me... are you sure? 301: patching exit should not be neccessary. Why do you need it? Pavel -- 64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=28 ttl=51 time=448769.1 ms