From: "Mark M. Hoffman" <mhoffman@lightlink.com>
To: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: dmitry pervushin <dpervushin@ru.mvista.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
lm-sensors <lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] SPI core
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 00:06:55 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050602040655.GE4906@jupiter.solarsys.private> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050531233215.GB23881@kroah.com>
Hi Greg, Dmitry:
> On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 08:09:16PM +0400, dmitry pervushin wrote:
> > In order to support the specific board, we have ported the generic SPI
> > core to the 2.6 kernel. This core provides basic API to create/manage
> > SPI devices like the I2C core does. We need to continue providing
> > support of SPI devices and would like to maintain the SPI subtree. It
> > would be nice if SPI core patch were applied to the vanilla kernel.
> > I2C people do not like to mainain this code as well as I2C, so...
* Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> [2005-05-31 16:32:15 -0700]:
> What do you mean by this? Which i2c people?
(...)
* Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> [2005-05-31 16:32:15 -0700]:
> This code is _very_ close to just a copy of the i2c core code. Why
> duplicate it and not work with the i2c people instead?
It was discussed briefly on the lm-sensors mailing list [1]. I didn't
reply at the time, but I do agree that SPI and I2C/SMBus are different
enough to warrant independent subsystems.
[1] http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/2005-May/012385.html
Regards,
--
Mark M. Hoffman
mhoffman@lightlink.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-06-02 4:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-05-31 16:09 dmitry pervushin
2005-05-31 18:33 ` randy_dunlap
2005-05-31 20:44 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2005-05-31 21:41 ` NZG
2005-05-31 23:20 ` Greg KH
2005-05-31 23:32 ` Greg KH
2005-06-02 4:06 ` Mark M. Hoffman [this message]
2005-06-02 4:51 ` Greg KH
2005-06-02 13:02 ` Rui Sousa
2005-06-09 7:15 ` Greg KH
2005-06-09 10:39 ` Hinko Kocevar
2005-06-09 15:41 ` Lee Revell
2005-06-02 10:09 ` dmitry pervushin
2005-06-09 12:33 ` Pekka Enberg
2005-06-09 16:19 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2005-06-09 17:41 ` Pekka Enberg
2005-06-01 1:19 David Brownell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050602040655.GE4906@jupiter.solarsys.private \
--to=mhoffman@lightlink.com \
--cc=dpervushin@ru.mvista.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®