mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: "Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
	discuss@x86-64.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ak@suse.de,
	nanhai.zou@intel.com, rohit.seth@intel.com,
	rajesh.shah@intel.com
Subject: Re: [Patch] x86_64: TASK_SIZE fixes for compatibility mode processes
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 15:19:13 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050602151912.B14384@unix-os.sc.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050602135013.4cba3ae2.akpm@osdl.org>; from akpm@osdl.org on Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 01:50:13PM -0700

On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 01:50:13PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> "Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > +#define TASK_SIZE_OF(child) 	((test_tsk_thread_flag(child, TIF_IA32)) ? IA32_PAGE_OFFSET : TASK_SIZE64)
> 
> The task size is an attribute of the task's mm_struct, not of the task.

ia64, ppc64 and s390 seems be getting this info from thread_info or 
thread_struct in the task struct.

> The place where this tends to come unstuck is when a 32-bit task holds a
> reference on a 64-bit tasks's task_struct via a read of a /proc file.  If
> the 64-bit task exits then it is the 32-bit task who does the final freeing
> of the 64-bit tasks's task_struct and mm_struct.  (and all vice-versa, of
> course).  Will your patch handle this race scenario correctly?

In recent kernels, instead of TASK_SIZE, "-1" is getting passed to unmap_vmas()
from exit_mmap. Same case with ceiling (set to "0") for free_pgtables().
It shouldn't be a problem with this, right?

thanks,
suresh

  reply	other threads:[~2005-06-02 22:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-06-02 20:32 Siddha, Suresh B
2005-06-02 20:50 ` Andrew Morton
2005-06-02 22:19   ` Siddha, Suresh B [this message]
2005-06-02 22:48     ` Andrew Morton
2005-06-02 23:06       ` [discuss] " Siddha, Suresh B
2005-06-03 15:48         ` Andi Kleen
2005-06-03 19:09           ` Siddha, Suresh B
2005-06-05 11:17             ` Andi Kleen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050602151912.B14384@unix-os.sc.intel.com \
    --to=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=discuss@x86-64.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nanhai.zou@intel.com \
    --cc=rajesh.shah@intel.com \
    --cc=rohit.seth@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome