From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261466AbVFBWlv (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Jun 2005 18:41:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261465AbVFBWlv (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Jun 2005 18:41:51 -0400 Received: from fire.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:58306 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261466AbVFBWhu (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Jun 2005 18:37:50 -0400 Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 15:38:34 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Martin Schwidefsky Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch 1/11] s390: cio max channels checks. Message-Id: <20050602153834.5e4dc0eb.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20050601180210.GA6418@localhost.localdomain> References: <20050601180210.GA6418@localhost.localdomain> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.0 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-vine-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Martin Schwidefsky wrote: > > [patch 1/11] s390: cio max channels checks. Which of these patches are considered to be 2.6.12 material?