From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Ingo Oeser <ioe-lkml@axxeo.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [rfc] [patch] consolidate/clean up spinlock.h files
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 18:16:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050602161633.GA12616@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200506021749.15206.ioe-lkml@axxeo.de>
* Ingo Oeser <ioe-lkml@axxeo.de> wrote:
> Hi Ingo,
> you wrote:
>
> > --- linux/lib/spinlock_debug.c.orig
> > +++ linux/lib/spinlock_debug.c
> > +#define SPIN_BUG_ON(cond, lock, msg) \
> > + if (unlikely(cond)) spin_bug(lock, __FILE__, __LINE__, msg)
> > +#define RWLOCK_BUG_ON(cond, lock, msg) \
> > + if (unlikely(cond)) rwlock_bug(lock, __FILE__, __LINE__, msg)
>
> I would suggest propagating the __FILE__ and __LINE__ from the CALLERS
> of those functions in lib/spinlock_debug.c into these macros, to make
> this info more useful. At the moment you just know, that the bug
> happend on some spinlock/rwlock, but not who caused this.
the real call site info comes from dump_stack(). Maybe i should remove
the __FILE__,__LINE__ info altogether. (albeit a bit redundancy wont
hurt) I dont think we want to pass in __FILE__,__LINE__ all the way from
the main APIs.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-06-02 16:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-02 14:40 Ingo Molnar
2005-06-02 15:49 ` Ingo Oeser
2005-06-02 16:16 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2005-06-02 16:30 ` Ingo Oeser
2005-06-02 16:34 ` Chris Friesen
2005-06-02 19:34 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2005-06-02 17:26 ` Andi Kleen
2005-06-02 19:16 ` Roman Zippel
2005-06-03 5:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-06-03 11:56 ` Roman Zippel
2005-06-02 19:59 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050602161633.GA12616@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=ioe-lkml@axxeo.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®