mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: "Lynch, Rusty" <rusty.lynch@intel.com>
Cc: ak@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, prasadav@us.ibm.com,
	hien@us.ibm.com, prasanna@in.ibm.com, jkenisto@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [patch] x86_64 specific function return probes
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 22:07:29 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050602220729.762d9385.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <032EB457B9DBC540BFB1B7B519C78B0E07499229@orsmsx404.amr.corp.intel.com>

"Lynch, Rusty" <rusty.lynch@intel.com> wrote:
>
> 
> From: Andi Kleen [mailto:ak@suse.de]
> >On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 09:09:09AM -0700, Rusty Lynch wrote:
> >> The following patch adds the x86_64 architecture specific
> implementation
> >> for function return probes to the 2.6.12-rc5-mm2 kernel.
> >
> >This is not a sufficient description for a patch. Can you describe
> >how it actually works and what it does?
> >
> 
> Ok, let me write up a description and I'll repost.

You did, but:

> >> + * Called when we hit the probe point at kretprobe_trampoline
> >> + */
> >> +int trampoline_probe_handler(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs)
> >> +{
> >> +	struct task_struct *tsk;
> >> +	struct kretprobe_instance *ri;
> >> +	struct hlist_head *head;
> >> +	struct hlist_node *node;
> >> +	unsigned long *sara = (unsigned long *)regs->rsp - 1;
> >> +
> >> +	tsk = arch_get_kprobe_task(sara);
> >
> >I dont think you handle the case of the exception happening on
> >a exception or interrupt stack. This is broken.

What about this problem?

  reply	other threads:[~2005-06-03  5:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-06-02 17:35 Lynch, Rusty
2005-06-03  5:07 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-06-03 16:54 Lynch, Rusty
2005-06-03 16:40 Lynch, Rusty
2005-06-03 16:45 ` Andi Kleen
2005-06-03 16:05 Lynch, Rusty
2005-06-02 20:58 Rusty Lynch
2005-06-03 15:45 ` Andi Kleen
2005-06-02 16:09 Rusty Lynch
2005-06-02 17:31 ` Andi Kleen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050602220729.762d9385.akpm@osdl.org \
    --to=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=hien@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=jkenisto@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=prasadav@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=prasanna@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=rusty.lynch@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome