From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261395AbVFDRLa (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Jun 2005 13:11:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261400AbVFDRLa (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Jun 2005 13:11:30 -0400 Received: from titan.genwebhost.com ([209.9.226.66]:19085 "EHLO titan.genwebhost.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261395AbVFDRL2 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Jun 2005 13:11:28 -0400 Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 10:11:16 -0700 From: randy_dunlap To: =?ISO-8859-1?B?SvZybg==?= Engel Cc: hch@infradead.org, schwab@suse.de, geert@linux-m68k.org, xiao@unice.fr, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Suggestion on "int len" sanity Message-Id: <20050604101116.1c016516.rdunlap@xenotime.net> In-Reply-To: <20050604170757.GA10788@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> References: <429EB537.4060305@unice.fr> <20050602084840.GA32519@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> <20050603110436.3f801c65.rdunlap@xenotime.net> <20050604112825.GC19819@infradead.org> <20050604095811.2b6057d7.rdunlap@xenotime.net> <20050604170757.GA10788@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> Organization: YPO4 X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - titan.genwebhost.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - vger.kernel.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - xenotime.net X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 4 Jun 2005 19:07:58 +0200 Jörn Engel wrote: | On Sat, 4 June 2005 09:58:11 -0700, randy_dunlap wrote: | > On Sat, 4 Jun 2005 12:28:25 +0100 Christoph Hellwig wrote: | > | | > | Who claims that? | > | > I dunno, but I'm not religious about it. | > | > It's certainly not in CodingStyle, but I'm sure that I'm not just | > dreaming it (not making it up), I've seen it in emails from some | > maintainers, but searching for /unsigned/ generates too many hits | > to follow. | | Which means, we can safely ignore this issue. If "some maintainers" | really care, this thing will resurface. Certainly. --- ~Randy