From: Denis Vlasenko <vda@ilport.com.ua>
To: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman), Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@in.ibm.com>,
linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Fastboot mailing list <fastboot@lists.osdl.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] Kdump: Disabling PCI interrupts in capture kernel
Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 16:18:24 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200506041618.24736.vda@ilport.com.ua> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m13brz9tkf.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>
On Friday 03 June 2005 21:36, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> writes:
>
> > On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 04:55:24PM +0530, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > In kdump, sometimes, general driver initialization issues seems to be cropping
> >
> > > in second kernel due to devices not being shutdown during crash and these
> > > devices are sending interrupts while second kernel is booting and drivers are
> >
> > > not expecting any interrupts yet.
> >
> > What are the errors you are seeing?
> > How would the drivers be able to be getting interrupts delivered to them
> > if they haven't registered the irq handler yet?
>
> As I recall the drivers were not getting the interrupts but the interrupts
> were happening. To stop being spammed the kernel disables the irq line,
> at the interrupt controller. Then when the driver registered the
> interrupt it would never receive the interrupt.
Shouldn't kernel keep all interrupt lines initially disabled
(sans platform-specific magic), and enable each like only when
a device driver requests IRQ? This sounds simpler to do...
--
vda
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-06-04 13:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-03 11:25 Vivek Goyal
2005-06-03 11:54 ` Richard B. Johnson
2005-06-03 15:24 ` Alan Stern
2005-06-03 18:26 ` Eric W. Biederman
2005-06-03 18:21 ` Greg KH
2005-06-03 18:36 ` Eric W. Biederman
2005-06-04 13:18 ` Denis Vlasenko [this message]
2005-06-04 13:43 ` [Fastboot] " Dipankar Sarma
2005-06-04 14:03 ` Dipankar Sarma
2005-06-04 21:14 ` Eric W. Biederman
2005-06-04 10:43 Vivek Goyal
2005-06-04 10:57 Vivek Goyal
2005-06-04 15:35 ` Alan Stern
2005-06-04 18:26 ` Grant Grundler
[not found] <4bExX-3uT-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
2005-06-04 12:38 ` Bodo Eggert
2005-06-07 3:07 Vivek Goyal
2005-06-07 5:07 ` Grant Grundler
2005-06-07 9:59 ` Eric W. Biederman
2005-06-07 16:21 ` Grant Grundler
2005-06-07 11:56 Vivek Goyal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200506041618.24736.vda@ilport.com.ua \
--to=vda@ilport.com.ua \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=fastboot@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=vgoyal@in.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome