RE: Stable 2.6.x.y kernel series...

[szonyi calin <caszonyi@yahoo.com>]

--- Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com> a écrit :

> 
> (because it's Friday, the time to yammer about such things...)
> 
> 
> Just wanted to say in public that I think the stable 2.6.x.y
> kernel 
> series is working out quite well.  Kudos to the
> stable@kernel.org team 
> for a job well done.
> 

What do you mean is working ? Those patches are mainly one line
 fixes to the 2.6.x tree so most of the time there is not a 
difference between them and the 2.6.x kernel

> The 2.6.x.y series is definitely filling a needed niche.
> 

They are making some people believe in word "stable" ;-)
It would be nice if they will be real stable (i.e. more fixes to
the kernel tree).

> 	Jeff
> 

Calin

P.S. No, i don't use 2.6.x.y because i don't think a one line
patch will make the kernel more stable. Just my 2c ...
P.S.2. I just checked again www.kernel.org and saw that in the
newer
2.6.x.y  kernels there are some more changes. So i'll give them
a try to see the difference ;-). But i'm reserved ;-) 

--
A mouse is a device used to point at 
the xterm you want to type in.
Kim Alm on a.s.r.


	

	
		
_____________________________________________________________________________ 
Découvrez le nouveau Yahoo! Mail : 1 Go d'espace de stockage pour vos mails, photos et vidéos ! 
Créez votre Yahoo! Mail sur http://fr.mail.yahoo.com