From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261780AbVFGA7J (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jun 2005 20:59:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261788AbVFGA7J (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jun 2005 20:59:09 -0400 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:13975 "EHLO parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261780AbVFGA7H (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jun 2005 20:59:07 -0400 Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 01:59:58 +0100 From: Al Viro To: Blaisorblade Cc: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Jeff Dike , akpm@osdl.org, torvalds@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 3/5] UML - Clean up tt mode remapping of UML binary Message-ID: <20050607005958.GK29811@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> References: <200506062008.j56K89YA008957@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> <200506070105.20422.blaisorblade@yahoo.it> <20050606235321.GJ29811@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> <200506070256.43104.blaisorblade@yahoo.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200506070256.43104.blaisorblade@yahoo.it> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 02:56:36AM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote: > > Per-subarch - perhaps not. Per-glibc-type - definitely needed. > No, because the setup for NPTL glibc works also on non-NPTL one. Actually, to > be exact, I've tested it *only* on normal glibc. I'm still waiting to get > some testing in NPTL environments, but I expect it to work. Now, that is interesting. Which script are you using for i386 and which libc version does it work with? > P.S: is it only me or you've sent about 20 copies of your last message? Headers?