From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261944AbVFGRuK (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jun 2005 13:50:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261943AbVFGRuJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jun 2005 13:50:09 -0400 Received: from fmr23.intel.com ([143.183.121.15]:8594 "EHLO scsfmr003.sc.intel.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261942AbVFGRuF (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jun 2005 13:50:05 -0400 Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 10:50:02 -0700 From: "Siddha, Suresh B" To: Bill Davidsen Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Pentium-D support Message-ID: <20050607105001.A27234@unix-os.sc.intel.com> References: <42A5B80A.4040709@tmr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <42A5B80A.4040709@tmr.com>; from davidsen@tmr.com on Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 11:06:50AM -0400 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 11:06:50AM -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote: > Is there any reason to think that > the scheduler would get confused by the CPU, such as thinking it was HT > or some such? 2.6.12-rc5 has the Intel dual core detection patches. With those, kernel can distinguish between cores and HT logical siblings. thanks, suresh