From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262048AbVFHAIS (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jun 2005 20:08:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262049AbVFHAIR (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jun 2005 20:08:17 -0400 Received: from fire.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:57302 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262048AbVFHAIL (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jun 2005 20:08:11 -0400 Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 17:08:53 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Christoph Lameter Cc: mbligh@mbligh.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.12-rc6-mm1 Message-Id: <20050607170853.3f81007a.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: References: <1004450000.1118188239@flay> <20050607165656.2517b417.akpm@osdl.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.0 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-vine-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Christoph Lameter wrote: > > On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > Diffprofile is wacko (HZ seems to be defaulting to 250 in -mm). > > > > Oh crap, so it does. That's wrong. > > Email by you and Linus indicated that 250 should be the default. Oh, OK. hrm. Martin, it would be useful if you could determine whether the kernbench slowdown was due to the 1000Hz->250Hz change, thanks. I'm assuming it was the CPU scheduler patches. There are 36 of them ;)