From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261816AbVFGS1s (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jun 2005 14:27:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261819AbVFGS1s (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jun 2005 14:27:48 -0400 Received: from perpugilliam.csclub.uwaterloo.ca ([129.97.134.31]:41195 "EHLO perpugilliam.csclub.uwaterloo.ca") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261816AbVFGS1j (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jun 2005 14:27:39 -0400 Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 14:27:37 -0400 To: Bill Davidsen Cc: Michael Thonke , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Pentium-D support Message-ID: <20050607182737.GR23621@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> References: <42A5B80A.4040709@tmr.com> <42A5C8A3.2090202@gmail.com> <42A5DD47.5090000@tmr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42A5DD47.5090000@tmr.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i From: lsorense@csclub.uwaterloo.ca (Lennart Sorensen) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 01:45:43PM -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote: > Okay, unless I can find an Intel-64 build of Fedora I'll have to do it > myself, but now that I know what option to use it's possible. Trust > Intel to have a 64 bit standard which isn't Itanium and isn't ..quite.. > AMD compatible. It should be instructionset compatible (at least almost) but optimization wise it is different since it is a very different design. Certainly Debian's amd64 runs on both just fine, but recomends different kernel builds for each (but also has one generic that runs on both). Len Sorensen