mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
To: paulus@samba.org
Cc: torvalds@osdl.org, akpm@osdl.org, anton@samba.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jk@blackdown.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ppc64: Fix PER_LINUX32 behaviour
Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2005 16:16:33 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050608.161633.55509444.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <17063.31568.618739.165823@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com>

From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 09:12:16 +1000

> There is still a point of difference between ppc64 and x86_64: on
> ppc64 (and on sparc64), if the personality is PER_LINUX32, the
> personality(0xffffffffUL) system call returns PER_LINUX, and attempts
> to set the personality to PER_LINUX don't change the personality
> (i.e. it stays set to PER_LINUX32), for both 32-bit and 64-bit
> processes.  On x86_64 this is true for 32-bit processes but not for
> 64-bit processes AFAICT.  Does anyone know why we do this at all, and
> whether doing it for 64-bit processes makes sense?

We do this because, at least when this code was written,
glibc would do a personality(PER_LINUX) call (either via
the dynamic linker or via some other libc startup code)
and this would undo the PER_LINUX32 setting.

Therefore, it makes sense to do this for all cases, not
just for 32-bit processes.  The x86_64 code ought to be
fixed, I think.

  reply	other threads:[~2005-06-08 23:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-06-08 11:59 Paul Mackerras
2005-06-08 17:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-06-08 18:49   ` Arnd Bergmann
2005-06-08 19:19     ` David S. Miller
2005-06-08 20:45       ` Olaf Hering
2005-06-08 20:45   ` Andreas Schwab
2005-06-08 20:54     ` Juergen Kreileder
2005-06-08 22:40       ` Andreas Schwab
2005-06-09  7:02         ` Juergen Kreileder
2005-06-08 23:12   ` Paul Mackerras
2005-06-08 23:16     ` David S. Miller [this message]
2005-06-11 11:24       ` Andi Kleen
2005-06-08 23:28     ` Linus Torvalds
2005-06-08 23:12   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
     [not found] <20050608.121950.104038734.davem@davemloft.net.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2005-06-08 20:50 ` Marcus Meissner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050608.161633.55509444.davem@davemloft.net \
    --to=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=anton@samba.org \
    --cc=jk@blackdown.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome