From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261233AbVFHNhx (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jun 2005 09:37:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261215AbVFHNhw (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jun 2005 09:37:52 -0400 Received: from ns.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:34254 "EHLO mx1.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261233AbVFHNhj (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jun 2005 09:37:39 -0400 Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 15:37:32 +0200 From: Andi Kleen To: Greg KH Cc: Arjan van de Ven , Andrew Vasquez , Jeff Garzik , "David S. Miller" , tom.l.nguyen@intel.com, roland@topspin.com, linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ak@suse.de Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] PCI: remove access to pci_[enable|disable]_msi() for drivers Message-ID: <20050608133732.GV23831@wotan.suse.de> References: <20050607002045.GA12849@suse.de> <20050607010911.GA9869@plap.qlogic.org> <20050607051551.GA17734@suse.de> <1118129500.5497.16.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <20050607161029.GB15345@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050607161029.GB15345@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > The issue is, if pci_enable_msix() fails, we want to fall back to MSI, > so you need to call pci_enable_msi() for that (after calling > pci_disable_msi() before calling pci_enable_msix(), what a mess...) It is messy in that case, but still preferable to having MSI code in every driver. I suppose most devices will not use MSI-X for some time... -Andi