From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261561AbVFHT2C (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jun 2005 15:28:02 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261562AbVFHT2B (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jun 2005 15:28:01 -0400 Received: from mx2.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:45478 "EHLO mx2.elte.hu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261561AbVFHT1w (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jun 2005 15:27:52 -0400 Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 21:24:03 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Daniel Walker Cc: kus Kusche Klaus , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-rc6-V0.7.48-00 Message-ID: <20050608192403.GB3411@elte.hu> References: <20050608155049.GA7160@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-ELTE-SpamVersion: MailScanner 4.31.6-itk1 (ELTE 1.2) SpamAssassin 2.63 ClamAV 0.73 X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-4.9, required 5.9, BAYES_00 -4.90 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamScore: -4 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Daniel Walker wrote: > > Thomas and me already did that - i think Thomas could send a patch for > > review? > > Well, making it is one thing, getting Russell to accept it is a whole > other issue.. Are you still willing to make the RT patch a sandbox for > this? the patch in essence generalizes the ARM IRQ features and merges them into the generic IRQ code - with minimal impact to the current ARM way of doing interrupts. The long-term end-result should be more architectures using the ARM IRQ handling methods such as irqchip. Ingo