From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262413AbVFIWvW (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jun 2005 18:51:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262273AbVFIWvW (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jun 2005 18:51:22 -0400 Received: from dsl027-180-168.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([216.27.180.168]:31417 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261470AbVFIWvO (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jun 2005 18:51:14 -0400 Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 15:51:00 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20050609.155100.93023939.davem@davemloft.net> To: nsankar@broadcom.com Cc: gregkh@suse.de, torvalds@osdl.org, akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz Subject: Re: [GIT PATCH] Another PCI fix for 2.6.12-rc6 From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <42A8C73C.6060005@broadcom.com> References: <20050609222033.GA12580@kroah.com> <20050609.153254.74562706.davem@davemloft.net> <42A8C73C.6060005@broadcom.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.4 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: "Narendra Sankar" Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 15:48:28 -0700 > So it would still be useful to have this patch in, would it not? Absolutely, the patch should go in. I just want to make sure the descrepency between the two Broadcom drivers gets resolved. TG3 does a MSI correctness check, BNX2 does not. And this is what doesn't make any sense.