From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org-S262408AbVFIORd@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S262408AbVFIORd (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Thu, 9 Jun 2005 10:17:33 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262409AbVFIORc
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Thu, 9 Jun 2005 10:17:32 -0400
Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:10638 "EHLO mx2.suse.de")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262408AbVFIOR3 (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 9 Jun 2005 10:17:29 -0400
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 16:17:24 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
       Parag Warudkar <kernel-stuff@comcast.net>,
       lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] new timeofday x86-64 arch specific changes (v. B1)
Message-ID: <20050609141724.GG23831@wotan.suse.de>
References: <060220051827.15835.429F4FA6000DF9D700003DDB220588617200009A9B9CD3040A029D0A05@comcast.net> <200506051015.33723.kernel-stuff@comcast.net> <20050606092925.GA23831@wotan.suse.de> <200506060746.23047.kernel-stuff@comcast.net> <20050608135138.GX23831@wotan.suse.de> <1118281635.6247.42.camel@mindpipe> <1118283133.5754.41.camel@cog.beaverton.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1118283133.5754.41.camel@cog.beaverton.ibm.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

> Wahzuntme! :)  Well, I'd be very interested if my patches were to blame,
> but I believe Parag said it happened with or without my patches.

Yes, he said it happened with plain rc5.
-Andi