From: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: Jeff Wiegley <jeffw@cyte.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>,
"Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: amd64 cdrom access locks system
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 16:32:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050609163216.A18636@unix-os.sc.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050609160045.69c579d2.akpm@osdl.org>; from akpm@osdl.org on Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 04:00:45PM -0700
On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 04:00:45PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Jeff Wiegley <jeffw@cyte.com> wrote:
> >
> > warning: many lost ticks.
> > Your time source seems to be instable or some driver is hogging interupts
> > rip default_idle+0x24/0x30
> > Falling back to HPET
> > divide error: 0000 [1] PREEMPT
> > ...
> > RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff80112704>] <ffffffff80112704>{timer_interrupt+244}
>
> The timer code got confused, fell back to the HPET timer and then got a
> divide-by-zero in timer_interrupt(). Probably because variable hpet_tick
> is zero.
>
> - It's probably a bug that the cdrom code is holding interrupts off for
> too long.
>
> Use hdparm and dmesg to see whether the driver is using DMA. If it
> isn't, fiddle with it until it is.
>
> - It's possibly a bug that we're falling back to HPET mode just because
> the cdrom driver is being transiently silly.
>
> - It's surely a bug that hpet_tick is zero after we've switched to HPET mode.
>
>
>
>
> Please test this workaround:
>
Only reason I can see for hpet_tick to be zero is when there was some error
in hpet_init(), and we start using PIT. But, later we try to fallback to an
uninitilized HPET.
Can you look at your dmesg before the hang and check what timer is getting used?
The dmesg line will look something like this...
time.c: Using ______ MHz ___ timer.
Thanks,
Venki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-06-09 23:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-08 1:09 Jeff Wiegley
2005-06-08 12:23 ` Andrew Morton
2005-06-09 15:36 ` Jeff Wiegley
2005-06-09 23:00 ` Andrew Morton
2005-06-09 19:38 ` Jeff Wiegley
2005-06-09 21:58 ` Jeff Wiegley
2005-06-09 23:32 ` Venkatesh Pallipadi [this message]
2005-06-09 18:23 ` Jeff Wiegley
2005-06-13 16:35 ` Jeff Wiegley
2005-06-14 7:55 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2005-06-14 10:35 ` Jeff Wiegley
2005-06-14 18:16 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2005-12-15 9:15 ` Aric Cyr
[not found] <4d3Xi-33s-31@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <4d7Rk-6fq-49@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <4dE0F-77V-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <4dEk0-7ua-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <4dJWr-38Z-33@gated-at.bofh.it>
2005-06-11 16:02 ` Robert Hancock
2005-08-09 7:47 David C. Young
[not found] <S1750841AbWAQXWc/20060117232242Z+104@vger.kernel.org>
2006-01-18 0:31 ` Christer Bäckström
2006-01-18 9:18 ` Alan Cox
2006-01-18 12:15 ` Christer Bäckström
2006-01-18 10:01 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2006-02-05 12:14 ` Erwin Rol
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050609163216.A18636@unix-os.sc.intel.com \
--to=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
--cc=ak@muc.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=jeffw@cyte.com \
--cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome