From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262576AbVFJPlz (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Jun 2005 11:41:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262588AbVFJPkk (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Jun 2005 11:40:40 -0400 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:51161 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262576AbVFJPfK (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Jun 2005 11:35:10 -0400 Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 16:35:06 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: li nux Cc: linux Subject: Re: 2.6: problem with module tainting the kernel Message-ID: <20050610153506.GA8118@infradead.org> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , li nux , linux References: <20050610152450.82261.qmail@web33315.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050610152450.82261.qmail@web33315.mail.mud.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 08:24:50AM -0700, li nux wrote: > In 2.6 kernels how to assure that on inserting our own > module, it doesn't throw the warning: > > "unsupported module, tainting kernel" There's no place in the kernel that produces this message. Are you using some odd vendor tree?