On Sat, 11 Jun 2005 14:14, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
> --"Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@mbligh.org> wrote (on Friday, June 10, 2005 > > 
OK, I backed out those 4, and the degredation mostly went away.
> > See
> > http://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/mbligh/abat/perf/kernbench.
> >moe.png
> >
> > and more specifically, see the +p5150 near the right hand side.
> > I don't think it's quite as good as mainline, but much closer.
> > I did this run with HZ=1000, and the the one with no scheduler
> > patches at all with HZ=250, so I'll try to do a run that's more
> > directly comparable as well
>
> OK, that makes it look much more like mainline. Looks like you were still
> revising the details of your patch Con ... once you're ready, drop me a
> URL for it, and I'll make the system whack on that too.

Great thanks. Here are rolled up all the reconsidered changes that apply 
directly to 2.6.12-rc6-mm1 -purely for testing purposes-. I'd be very 
grateful to see how this performed; it has been boot and stress tested at 
this end. If it shows detriment I'll have to make the smp nice changes more 
complex.

Cheers,
Con