From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261466AbVFMLGD (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jun 2005 07:06:03 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261468AbVFMLGD (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jun 2005 07:06:03 -0400 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:59051 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261466AbVFMLGA (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jun 2005 07:06:00 -0400 Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 12:05:56 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: David Woodhouse Cc: bert hubert , Ulrich Drepper , Linus Torvalds , jnf , Alan Cox , Linux Kernel Mailing List , akpm@osdl.org Subject: Re: Add pselect, ppoll system calls. Message-ID: <20050613110556.GA26039@infradead.org> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , David Woodhouse , bert hubert , Ulrich Drepper , Linus Torvalds , jnf , Alan Cox , Linux Kernel Mailing List , akpm@osdl.org References: <1118444314.4823.81.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1118616499.9949.103.camel@localhost.localdomain> <42AD2640.5040601@redhat.com> <20050613091600.GA32364@outpost.ds9a.nl> <1118655702.2840.24.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1118655702.2840.24.camel@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 10:41:41AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 11:16 +0200, bert hubert wrote: > > So, please, consider merging the patches.. ppoll is something else, I never > > heard about it, but pselect is widely known. > > It just seemed silly to implement pselect() without doing ppoll() at the > same time. Yes, it kinda makes sense. Question to Uli: would you put ppoll() into glibc as GNU extension? If not adding the syscall is rather poinless unfortunately.