From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261437AbVFOAPU (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Jun 2005 20:15:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261438AbVFOAPU (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Jun 2005 20:15:20 -0400 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:18327 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261437AbVFOAPQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Jun 2005 20:15:16 -0400 Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 17:16:02 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: christoph Cc: ak@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, shai@scalex86.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Move some variables into the "most_readonly" section?? Message-Id: <20050614171602.12bfa245.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20050608131839.GP23831@wotan.suse.de> <20050614162354.6aabe57e.akpm@osdl.org> <20050614165818.6f83fa6c.akpm@osdl.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.0 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-vine-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org christoph wrote: > > On Tue, 14 Jun 2005, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > Yup that makes the whole thing much more sane. Can we specify multiple > > > attributes to a variable? > > Seems OK? > > Looks fine. Want a patch against the existing fixes in mm1? So that we > have a whatever-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix? Let's see what it looks like. Two patches please. One againt the core (optimise-storage-of-read-mostly-variables*.patch) and one against the users (move-some-more-structures-into-mostly_readonly-and-readonly.patch).