From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261350AbVFNVhv (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Jun 2005 17:37:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261352AbVFNVhv (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Jun 2005 17:37:51 -0400 Received: from gprs189-60.eurotel.cz ([160.218.189.60]:1925 "EHLO amd.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261350AbVFNVhp (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Jun 2005 17:37:45 -0400 Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 23:37:28 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: dagit@codersbase.com Cc: Shaohua Li , stefandoesinger@gmx.at, acpi-dev , Matthew Garrett , lkml Subject: Re: S3 test tool (was : Re: Bizarre oops after suspend to RAM (was: Re: [ACPI] Resume from Suspend to RAM)) Message-ID: <20050614213728.GB2172@elf.ucw.cz> References: <200506061531.41132.stefandoesinger@gmx.at> <1118125410.3828.12.camel@linux-hp.sh.intel.com> <87ll5diemh.fsf@www.codersbase.com> <20050614090652.GA1863@elf.ucw.cz> <87aclthr7l.fsf@www.codersbase.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87aclthr7l.fsf@www.codersbase.com> X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! > > You got this wrong. It is three illegal instructions but > > *nested*. Like error, error in fault handler, error in doublefault > > handler. > > Ah. Yeah, this isn't an area I know much about :) Thanks for the > correction. > > > Try replacing flags manipulation with any stack manipulation to see > > what is wrong. > > Do you mean try something like this? Replace the push 0 with push > 0x1234 ; push 0x1234 ; pop ; pop and try to figure out which line > causes the reboot? Yep, try pushl $0, popl %eax; if that causes problems, something is seriously wrong with stack, otherwise changing flags hurts. > > Like perhaps processor docs? > > Is that what I want to look at? I was the one asking the question. ;) Yes. Pavel -- teflon -- maybe it is a trademark, but it should not be.