From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261266AbVFTHcB (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Jun 2005 03:32:01 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261478AbVFTHcB (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Jun 2005 03:32:01 -0400 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:45724 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261266AbVFTHb7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Jun 2005 03:31:59 -0400 Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 00:31:37 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Nick Piggin Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, andrea@suse.de, mason@suse.de Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] vm early reclaim orphaned pages (take 2) Message-Id: <20050620003137.32163b67.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <1119252194.6240.22.camel@npiggin-nld.site> References: <1118978590.5261.4.camel@npiggin-nld.site> <1119252194.6240.22.camel@npiggin-nld.site> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Nick Piggin wrote: > > How about this? > It might be good, it's hard to tell. Performance testing is needed. > --- linux-2.6.orig/mm/swap.c 2004-12-25 08:34:31.000000000 +1100 > +++ linux-2.6/mm/swap.c 2005-06-20 17:20:28.216728238 +1000 > @@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ > spin_lock_irqsave(&zone->lru_lock, flags); > if (PageLRU(page) && !PageActive(page)) { > list_del(&page->lru); > - list_add_tail(&page->lru, &zone->inactive_list); > + list_move_tail(&page->lru, &zone->inactive_list); > inc_page_state(pgrotated); > } > if (!test_clear_page_writeback(page)) > @@ -97,6 +97,32 @@ > } Correctness testing is needed too ;)