From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261332AbVFUIrk (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jun 2005 04:47:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262091AbVFUIra (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jun 2005 04:47:30 -0400 Received: from mx1.elte.hu ([157.181.1.137]:443 "EHLO mx1.elte.hu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261332AbVFUIpL (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jun 2005 04:45:11 -0400 Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 10:44:26 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Esben Nielsen Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-V0.7.49-00 Message-ID: <20050621084426.GA13094@elte.hu> References: <20050619134400.GA19795@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-ELTE-SpamVersion: MailScanner 4.31.6-itk1 (ELTE 1.2) SpamAssassin 2.63 ClamAV 0.73 X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-4.9, required 5.9, autolearn=not spam, BAYES_00 -4.90 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamScore: -4 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Esben Nielsen wrote: > I am seeing very high latencies on 2.6.12-RT-V0.7.50-04 with a > modified realfeel2: maximum is 246 us. Shouldn't it be in the order of > 50 us? i never got reliable results from realfeel - it should do the kind of careful things rtc_wakeup does to avoid false positives. Ingo