From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261480AbVFUOmZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jun 2005 10:42:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262064AbVFUOlp (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jun 2005 10:41:45 -0400 Received: from emailhub.stusta.mhn.de ([141.84.69.5]:61448 "HELO mailout.stusta.mhn.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S262082AbVFUOkn (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jun 2005 10:40:43 -0400 Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 16:40:41 +0200 From: Adrian Bunk To: perex@suse.cz Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: ALSA: Is CONFIG_SND_DEBUG_MEMORY really required? Message-ID: <20050621144041.GP3666@stusta.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, I was a bit surprised to discover that ALSA has it's own memory debugging infrastructure. Is there a reason why CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB isn't good enough for ALSA? cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed