From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262382AbVFUWkm (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jun 2005 18:40:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262429AbVFUWj5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jun 2005 18:39:57 -0400 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:33465 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262315AbVFUWS3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jun 2005 18:18:29 -0400 Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 15:18:06 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: "J.A. Magallon" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] more signed char cleanups in scripts Message-Id: <20050621151806.07ef0f78.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <1119391748l.25237l.3l@werewolf.able.es> References: <20050619233029.45dd66b8.akpm@osdl.org> <1119391748l.25237l.3l@werewolf.able.es> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org "J.A. Magallon" wrote: > > This cleans the last signedness problems I have seen in scripts, at least > what I can see with make oldconfig, make config, make menuconfig, > make gconfig and make. Remind me: what's the point in these changes? I see no particular problem using uchar in the kallsyms code - I often prefer it, because you can just look at the code and not have to worry about nasty sign-extension problems.