From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262712AbVFVEUe (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jun 2005 00:20:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262626AbVFVEUd (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jun 2005 00:20:33 -0400 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:12444 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262624AbVFVEU2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jun 2005 00:20:28 -0400 Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 21:19:59 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: teigland@redhat.com Cc: dteigland@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: -mm -> 2.6.13 merge status (configfs) Message-Id: <20050621211959.73c67442.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20050620235458.5b437274.akpm@osdl.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org David Teigland wrote: > > On 6/21/05, Andrew Morton wrote: > > git-ocfs > > > > The OCFS2 filesystem. OK by me, although I'm not sure it's had enough > > review. > > Does this include configfs? I'd especially like to see that sooner > rather than later. There's not a lot of point in adding a fs which has no in-kernel users.